Exploring the Roger Fincher files

ROGER FINCHER — MY WORKERS COMPENSATION ATTORNEY
A Personal Account
Navigating the complexities
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
This website discusses a pending lawsuit and ongoing legal matters. The statements below reflect personal opinion and experience. This content is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice.
I hired Roger Fincher to represent me in my workers compensation case against The Hershey Company.
It is my opinion that Roger Fincher was not working for me.
It is my opinion that Roger Fincher was working in collaboration with Hershey's workers compensation attorney.
I will explain fully when the time is appropriate.
A disciplinary complaint has been filed against Roger Fincher with the Kansas Disciplinary Administrator.

Unveiling the truth

The core purpose of this page is to present an unfiltered view of the events and details that have shaped my experiences. I believe in transparency and the power of documented evidence to tell a complete story. This collection is a testament to that belief.

What you will find here

This page serves as a comprehensive archive. You can expect to discover a range of materials, including personal narratives, official communications, research findings, and any other relevant documentation that chronicles my engagement with "The Hershey Thing." Each file is presented to offer a clearer understanding of the situation from my perspective. My aim is to provide comprehensive context and direct evidence for all who seek to understand these complex matters.

For those who seek understanding

This page is intended for anyone interested in delving deeper into the specifics of "The Hershey Thing" and my personal journey. Whether you are a legal professional, a fellow advocate, a journalist, or simply a curious individual, I hope these files provide you with valuable insights. My aspiration is that after exploring this collection, you will gain a profound understanding of the challenges faced and the continuous effort to bring these issues to light.

Exploring the Roger Fincher files

Unveiling the truth

What you will find here

For those who seek understanding

Statement of Claims

Count I – Failure to Provide Required Safety Equipment
Defendant failed to provide mandated rubber safety mats despite written policy and training materials requiring their use.

Count II – Failure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation (ADA Violations)
Defendant was informed of Plaintiff’s neuropathy and related limitations and refused to provide reasonable accommodations as required under disability law.

Count III – Failure to File a Mandatory Injury Report
Defendant declined to document an on-the-job injury after Plaintiff reported and visibly exhibited wounds, in violation of workplace reporting standards.

Count IV – Denial of Medical Treatment / Failure to Render Aid
Defendant failed to provide basic medical attention or first aid after being notified of an active workplace injury.

Count V – Assignment to Unsafe Work Conditions
Defendant knowingly required Plaintiff to work at the only station without safety mats while numerous alternative employees were available, creating foreseeable risk of injury.

Count VI – Unpaid Required Work (Wage and Hour Violations)
Defendant required employees to don and doff protective gear off the clock, resulting in uncompensated work time and systematic underpayment.

Count VII – Retaliation for Reporting Safety Concerns
After Plaintiff raised safety and accommodation issues, Defendant engaged in retaliatory conduct contrary to federal and state protections.

Count VIII – Wrongful Termination Following Workplace Injury
Plaintiff was terminated after sustaining injuries caused by Defendant’s assignments and after reporting safety violations.

Exploring the Roger Fincher files

Unveiling the truth

What you will find here

For those who seek understanding

Statement of Claims

Count I – Failure to Provide Required Safety EquipmentDefendant failed to provide mandated rubber safety mats despite written policy and training materials requiring their use.

Count II – Failure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation (ADA Violations)Defendant was informed of Plaintiff’s neuropathy and related limitations and refused to provide reasonable accommodations as required under disability law.

Count III – Failure to File a Mandatory Injury ReportDefendant declined to document an on-the-job injury after Plaintiff reported and visibly exhibited wounds, in violation of workplace reporting standards.

Count IV – Denial of Medical Treatment / Failure to Render AidDefendant failed to provide basic medical attention or first aid after being notified of an active workplace injury.

Count V – Assignment to Unsafe Work ConditionsDefendant knowingly required Plaintiff to work at the only station without safety mats while numerous alternative employees were available, creating foreseeable risk of injury.

Count VI – Unpaid Required Work (Wage and Hour Violations)Defendant required employees to don and doff protective gear off the clock, resulting in uncompensated work time and systematic underpayment.

Count VII – Retaliation for Reporting Safety ConcernsAfter Plaintiff raised safety and accommodation issues, Defendant engaged in retaliatory conduct contrary to federal and state protections.

Count VIII – Wrongful Termination Following Workplace InjuryPlaintiff was terminated after sustaining injuries caused by Defendant’s assignments and after reporting safety violations.

Count I – Failure to Provide Required Safety Equipment
Defendant failed to provide mandated rubber safety mats despite written policy and training materials requiring their use.

Count II – Failure to Provide Reasonable Accommodation (ADA Violations)
Defendant was informed of Plaintiff’s neuropathy and related limitations and refused to provide reasonable accommodations as required under disability law.

Count III – Failure to File a Mandatory Injury Report
Defendant declined to document an on-the-job injury after Plaintiff reported and visibly exhibited wounds, in violation of workplace reporting standards.

Count IV – Denial of Medical Treatment / Failure to Render Aid
Defendant failed to provide basic medical attention or first aid after being notified of an active workplace injury.

Count V – Assignment to Unsafe Work Conditions
Defendant knowingly required Plaintiff to work at the only station without safety mats while numerous alternative employees were available, creating foreseeable risk of injury.

Count VI – Unpaid Required Work (Wage and Hour Violations)
Defendant required employees to don and doff protective gear off the clock, resulting in uncompensated work time and systematic underpayment.

Count VII – Retaliation for Reporting Safety Concerns
After Plaintiff raised safety and accommodation issues, Defendant engaged in retaliatory conduct contrary to federal and state protections.

Count VIII – Wrongful Termination Following Workplace Injury
Plaintiff was terminated after sustaining injuries caused by Defendant’s assignments and after reporting safety violations.