Lee Timmons To Be Named

This

Why Lee Timmons Is Individually Named in My Case

This page explains the specific actions and decisions made by Lee Timmons that justify naming him individually in my lawsuit.

  1. He personally reclassified my injury as “neuropathy.”

The company’s own medical documentation states my injury was caused by prolonged standing on concrete without mats.

His reclassification from work injury to neuropathy directly contradicts the medical findings.

This creates personal involvement in the decision to deny the work-related nature of my injury.

2. He saw and knew about my wound and the suffering it caused.

My worsening injury was visible.

He had direct knowledge of the pain, limping, and deterioration.

He still chose to treat it as a non-issue.

  3. He continued assigning me to an unsafe position without mats.

He knowingly placed me in the one position on the line without required mats.

It was a one‑person station with 15+ healthy staff available and four rotations per shift.

Yet out of all those workers, Lee Timmons was consistently assigning me to that position.

He would sit in his office and watch me limp, struggle, and suffer.

This establishes actual knowledge of an unsafe condition and a deliberate decision to place me in harm’s way.

   4.Retaliation Indicators

After I raised safety concerns, my treatment at work noticeably changed.

I was denied accommodations, singled out for the easiest and most  painful to me  rotation because that position had no mats, and disciplined instead of protected.

These actions followed immediately after reporting my injury and requesting help.

This timing supports a retaliation claim, showing that negative treatment occurred because I spoke up.

5. Legal Standards Supporting His Individual Liability

Actual Knowledge Standard: When a supervisor knows an employee is injured and continues to place them in unsafe conditions, they can be held personally liable under certain state and federal doctrines.

Deliberate Indifference: Assigning an injured worker to a station known to cause additional harm meets the test for reckless disregard of safety.

Failure to Accommodate (ADA/State Law): Supervisors who participate directly in denying reasonable accommodations may be named individually depending on jurisdiction.

Retaliation Statutes: Individuals who take retaliatory actions after a worker reports safety hazards or injuries may face personal exposure.

These standards show that Lee Timmons was not just a bystander — he was an active decision-maker, and his choices directly contributed to the harm I suffered.

THE FIRST PICTURE SHOWS ORIGINAL INJURY.

This picture shows a later picture showing progressive damages from being forced to work without medical treatment that I was refused because of his false reclassification of my injury and refusing a to write the correct report.